I think something to consider with these super cheap metal halide light bulbs is, why are they so cheap? What in this hobby (and for that matter any hobby) is dirt cheap and is still of good quality? Very little to nothing in my experience. What is the PAR or at least the CRI of these lamps? Regardless of the kelvin temperature or wattage, lamps that don't have proper photosynthetically Active radiation are not of great use to reef inhabitants. Replacing lamps every six months to compensate for their low quality isn't going to help much, if at all either. If these are low quality bulbs, they are low quality from day one. Contrary to popular belief, good quality metal halide bulbs operated off quality ballasts (especially the nicer electronic ballasts)can easily last well over 12 months, some have reported lamps at and beyond 2 years before needing replaced. That being the case, the argument that it's cheaper to buy new lamps every six months is moot. Using hand held light meters will help determine how much "usable" light is being provided by a lighting system. It's also a very good tool for determining at what point our lights need replaced. As important as light is to our photosynthetic inverts, it makes absolutely no sense to cut corners in this department.
Now I can't speak for the aforementioned lamps specifically to say they are good or bad lamps, I don't know. I would be curious to see if any legitimate tests have been done on them to determine how much useful light they produce and for how long. Does anyone have any information or test results about these lamps?