Yeah, alot for not... The little point finger and divert game they are playing afterwards is what kills me... they are like well we didnt know, or we wouldnt have... well you "thought" he was 400-450yrs old, and it was then ok to open him?
How about the comments where they are like well he prolly isnt one of a kind, we have 200 in a lab and thousands are collected commercially a year, so its a good chance those are just as old.... let me get this right... you have 200 in a lab and thousands are caught yearly... and he was the oldest found.... i dont think that comment helps your case that it wasnt that big of a deal.